Download now a fully functional version of Xbench 3.0 and try it free of charge for 30 days. Checklists are an array of user-defined searches that can be executed on all your translations at a blazing speed. Edit your Files Right at the Offending Segment.

Application to test your systems encode speed using the XviD codec. May be handy when overclocking or upgrading to compare speeds or compare against different peoples systems. Download, unzip, and install xbench.NET program file. Download, unzip, and install xbench.NET media file. The media file is now a seperate download and only needs to be downloaded once, even when program gets updated.

The 'xbench.NET' process should only take a minute or two to complete. On completion, the installation folder will contain a both a screenshot and text file of your score. Download xbench.NET Program File >> HERE (> HERE (Media File.zip). Now, after unpacking, that ClamAV shows no virus/trojan doesn't this make you think that lots of these type of programs (trojan checkers e.t.c.) are just shite. Further to this, I just checked the official XviD v1.1.2 file and guess what, the totalvirus scan just picked up four so-called virii/trojans.

It is the name of delight and of thrill. You May Also Like: About GTRacing 2 Hack It is the best option for the players who like an adventure in their life. The gaming reviews will tell you how to enjoy the real thrill while sitting indoors. One of the improved version of the sports car is available at the best price. It makes your gaming experience more interesting and charming with the most efficient and dependable features of the producing thrill and adventure. Torrents hacker experience 1.

What a load of crap. I'm made a note of the four scanner programs so I make sure I never buy/use any of their products.

Just a note: This thread seems to have gone completely off track. Any chance an admin can split the thread, maybe at post #8, to its own thread about the virus/trojan stuff, if that's possible? @The scientist, could you develop on your x, y z parts? Is it 1/2 pass related or.?They are 1 pass (quant) mode, but it doesn't really matter, it's not a test to determine how many FPS you can encode with using XviD as such, but the encode speed in comparison to someone else running the same program (xbench.NET). So I could get the FPS value and * 2 / 3.542 ^ 3 -1982 + 7, it doesn't matter, as long as it does the same everytime it's ran and on other systems and/or configurations. Lol, anyway, now that's out of the way, roughly, this is some of the settings (approx): [X] quant_type 0 (H263) No Chromame no qpel no gmc motion_search/vhq_mode 5/1 turbo ON [Y] quant_type 1 (MPEG) Chromame ON qpel ON no gmc motion_search/vhq_mode 6/1 turbo OFF [Z] quant_type 2 (MPEG Custom) Chromame ON qpel ON gmc ON motion_search/vhq_mode 6/4 turbo OFF Custom Matrix Like I said, it doesn't matter what the settings are, as it's a comparison test to other tests using the same program and settings. Further to this, I just checked the official XviD v1.1.2 file and guess what, the totalvirus scan just picked up four so-called virii/trojans.

What a load of crap. I'm made a note of the four scanner programs so I make sure I never buy/use any of their products.

I'm sorry but I considered as an official 1.1.2 build Koepi's build, as the official Xvid platform download page leads there: As you can see above, 30 out 30 AV scanners gave it a CLEAN bill, without any trace of viruses/trojans. Anyway, I'm sorry that I made this thread off-topic, but the results really surprised me. I will get back on the topic with another screenshots soon. Anyway, I'm sorry that I made this thread off-topic, but the results really surprised me.No need to apologise, at least it gave us all something to chat about.:) Thanks for posting the screenshots, nice to see the different numbers on the different systems.

@jeffy: That's some over-clocking you got going there, I had my old p4 (2.4GHz) clocked at 3GHz for years, it gave me a warm feeling knowing I was getting something for free:) But a 2.4 to 3.5, phew, I'd be scared, I wanna stick mine up to 2.8 or maybe 3.0 but untill I get hold of a decent modern mATX board that actually has some overclocking features I'm stuffed. Your results are interesting though. Notice the first test [X] is almost the same between mine and yours, even though I'm running @ 2.4 and you at 3.5. The [X] encode is using low (fast) speed encode settings so I would assume here the CPU is not the bottleneck and it's the rest of the PC (board/ram/hard drive) that's struggling to keep up, hence the similar value.